1977 Toyota Mark II vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 314 more horse power than 1977 Toyota Mark II. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1977 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 556 kg more than 1977 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Toyota Mark II | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
| Model | Mark II | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1988 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1751 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1377 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2852 mm |
