1977 Volvo 164 vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2011 Ford C-Max. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford C-Max.
Because 1977 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Volvo 164 (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford C-Max. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1977 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Volvo 164 | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Volvo | Ford |
Model | 164 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1977 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2664 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5610 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3350 mm | 2648 mm |