1977 Zastava 1300 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1977 Zastava 1300. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1977 Zastava 1300.
Because 1977 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Zastava 1300 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Zastava | Holden |
| Model | 1300 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2685 mm |
