1977 Zastava 132 vs. 2010 Peugeot 807
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 807 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 807 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 807 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1977 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 807 should accelerate faster than 1977 Zastava 132.
Because 1977 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 807, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 807 (371 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 807 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Zastava 132 | 2010 Peugeot 807 | |
| Make | Zastava | Peugeot |
| Model | 132 | 807 |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1756 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 371 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2830 mm |
