1978 Abarth A 112 vs. 1949 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1978 Abarth A 112 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1978 Abarth A 112.
Because 1949 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Abarth A 112 | 1949 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 5425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3210 mm |
