1978 Abarth A 112 vs. 1976 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1978 Abarth A 112 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,480 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 325 kg more than 1978 Abarth A 112.
Because 1976 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Abarth A 112 | 1976 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Abarth | Zastava |
| Model | A 112 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1480 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2430 mm |
