1978 Abarth A 112 vs. 2009 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 950 kg more than 1978 Abarth A 112.
Because 2009 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Abarth A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1978 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1978 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Abarth A 112 | 2009 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 5999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 332 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2950 mm |
