1978 Abarth A 112 vs. 2009 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 950 kg more than 1978 Abarth A 112.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1978 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1978 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Abarth A 112 | 2009 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | A 112 | STS |
Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 3599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2960 mm |