1978 Alpina B6 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 365 kg more than 1978 Alpina B6.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Alpina B6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Alpina B6 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Alpina | Cadillac |
| Model | B6 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 3599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 263 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2890 mm |
