1978 Alpine A 310 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Alpine A 310 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 467 kg more than 1978 Alpine A 310.
Because 1978 Alpine A 310 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Alpine A 310. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Alpine A 310. (208 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Alpine A 310.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Alpine A 310 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Alpine | Volvo |
Model | A 310 | C30 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 208 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |