1978 AMC Pacer vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 1978 AMC Pacer is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 AMC Pacer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 AMC Pacer weights approximately 133 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 AMC Pacer has automatic transmission and 1952 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1952 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 AMC Pacer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 AMC Pacer | 1952 Riley RM A | |
| Make | AMC | Riley |
| Model | Pacer | RM A |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 4228 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1368 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2870 mm |
