1978 AMC Pacer vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1978 AMC Pacer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP) has 205 more horse power than 1978 AMC Pacer. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1978 AMC Pacer.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 AMC Pacer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 AMC Pacer | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | AMC | Cadillac |
Model | Pacer | 62 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 6381 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 325 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 98.4 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3310 mm |