1978 AMC Pacer vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1978 AMC Pacer is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1978 AMC Pacer. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1978 AMC Pacer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 AMC Pacer weights approximately 228 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 AMC Pacer | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | AMC | Sunbeam |
| Model | Pacer | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 4228 cc | 4259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1368 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 27 L |
