1978 AMC Pacer vs. 1980 Triumph Dolomite
To start off, 1980 Triumph Dolomite is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 AMC Pacer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 AMC Pacer would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 AMC Pacer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 AMC Pacer (120 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1980 Triumph Dolomite. (57 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 AMC Pacer should accelerate faster than 1980 Triumph Dolomite.
Because 1980 Triumph Dolomite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Triumph Dolomite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 AMC Pacer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 AMC Pacer | 1980 Triumph Dolomite | |
Make | AMC | Triumph |
Model | Pacer | Dolomite |
Year Released | 1978 | 1980 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 57 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 76 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2460 mm |