1978 AMC Pacer vs. 2000 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 AMC Pacer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 AMC Pacer would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 AMC Pacer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (220 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1978 AMC Pacer. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1978 AMC Pacer.
Because 2000 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 AMC Pacer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 AMC Pacer has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 AMC Pacer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 AMC Pacer | 2000 Ford Falcon | |
Make | AMC | Ford |
Model | Pacer | Falcon |
Year Released | 1978 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 220 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 99.3 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2800 mm |