1978 AMC Pacer vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 AMC Pacer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 AMC Pacer would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 AMC Pacer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1978 AMC Pacer. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1978 AMC Pacer.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 AMC Pacer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 AMC Pacer | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | AMC | Ford |
Model | Pacer | Ranger |
Year Released | 1978 | 2002 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3010 mm |