1978 AMC Pacer vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 AMC Pacer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 AMC Pacer would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1978 AMC Pacer. (90 HP @ 3050 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1978 AMC Pacer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 405 kg more than 1978 AMC Pacer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 AMC Pacer. (222 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 AMC Pacer.
Compare all specifications:
1978 AMC Pacer | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | AMC | Jeep |
Model | Pacer | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1978 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3802 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 3050 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.8 mm | 87 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1359 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 78 L |