1978 AMC Pacer vs. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 AMC Pacer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 AMC Pacer would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 AMC Pacer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (340 HP) has 220 more horse power than 1978 AMC Pacer. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1978 AMC Pacer.
Because 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 AMC Pacer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 AMC Pacer | 2005 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | AMC | Chrysler |
Model | Pacer | Crossfire |
Year Released | 1978 | 2005 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 3195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 340 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2410 mm |