1978 AMC Pacer vs. 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 AMC Pacer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 AMC Pacer would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche (295 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1978 AMC Pacer. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 1978 AMC Pacer.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 AMC Pacer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 AMC Pacer | 2006 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | AMC | Chevrolet |
Model | Pacer | Avalanche |
Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 295 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 91.9 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3310 mm |