1978 AMC Pacer vs. 2006 Ford E-150
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 AMC Pacer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 AMC Pacer would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1978 AMC Pacer. (90 HP @ 3050 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1978 AMC Pacer.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 AMC Pacer. (222 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 AMC Pacer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 AMC Pacer | 2006 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | AMC | Ford |
| Model | Pacer | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3802 cc | 4604 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3050 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 222 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.8 mm | 90 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 132 L |
