1978 AMC Pacer vs. 2008 Ford Explorer

To start off, 2008 Ford Explorer is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 AMC Pacer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 AMC Pacer would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 AMC Pacer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Explorer (210 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1978 AMC Pacer. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1978 AMC Pacer.

Because 2008 Ford Explorer is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Ford Explorer. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 AMC Pacer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1978 AMC Pacer 2008 Ford Explorer
Make AMC Ford
Model Pacer Explorer
Year Released 1978 2008
Body Type Station Wagon SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4228 cc 4013 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 120 HP 210 HP
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 3320 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]