1978 Audi 100 vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1978 Audi 100. (70 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1978 Audi 100.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Audi 100. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 100 | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 100 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3010 mm |