1978 Audi 100 vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Audi 100 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1978 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1978 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 856 kg more than 1978 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Audi 100. 2010 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1978 Audi 100 has manual transmission. 1978 Audi 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1978 Audi 100 2010 Mazda CX-9
Make Audi Mazda
Model 100 CX-9
Year Released 1978 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1588 cc 3700 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 85 HP 273 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 124 Nm 366 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1110 kg 1966 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 5075 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1935 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1727 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2875 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 76 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]