1978 Audi 50 vs. 1960 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1978 Audi 50 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 771 cc, 1978 Audi 50 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 50 | 1960 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 50 | R 360 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1960 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 16 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1300 mm |