1978 Audi 50 vs. 1964 Jaguar 3.8
To start off, 1978 Audi 50 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar 3.8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar 3.8 would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar 3.8 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Jaguar 3.8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Jaguar 3.8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 50 | 1964 Jaguar 3.8 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | 50 | 3.8 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1964 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 3781 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 221 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1700 mm |