1978 Audi 50 vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1978 Audi 50 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 771 cc, 1978 Audi 50 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 50 | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Audi | DAF |
Model | 50 | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1978 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 745 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1450 mm |