1978 Audi 50 vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 1978 Audi 50 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Volvo 145 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 50 | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | 50 | 145 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 1986 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1720 mm |