1978 Audi 50 vs. 1976 Zastava 132
To start off, 1978 Audi 50 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 50 | 1976 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | 50 | 132 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 1756 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1650 mm |