1978 Audi 50 vs. 1981 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1981 Toyota Cressida is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1981 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 50 | 1981 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 50 | Cressida |
Year Released | 1978 | 1981 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1700 mm |