1978 Audi 50 vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma has automatic transmission and 1978 Audi 50 has manual transmission. 1978 Audi 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 50 | 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | 50 | Sigma |
Year Released | 1978 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1660 mm |