1978 Audi 50 vs. 1986 Nissan Leopard
To start off, 1986 Nissan Leopard is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,770 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Nissan Leopard is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Nissan Leopard is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Nissan Leopard. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 50 | 1986 Nissan Leopard | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 50 | Leopard |
Year Released | 1978 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 1770 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 98 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1700 mm |