1978 Audi 50 vs. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1990 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1990 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1990 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 50 | 1990 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 50 | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1978 | 1990 |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1660 mm |