1978 Audi 50 vs. 1992 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1992 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Audi 50 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 50 | 1992 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 50 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1978 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 3791 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 5050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1850 mm |