1978 Audi 50 vs. 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Audi 50 would be higher. At 3,493 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Audi 50 | 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | 50 | R 390 GT1 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 771 cc | 3493 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 550 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2010 mm |
