1978 Audi 50 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Audi 50 would be higher.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 50 | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | 50 | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 3678 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1585 mm |