1978 Audi 80 vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1978 Audi 80 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,272 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Audi 80 weights approximately 247 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Audi 80 | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Audi | DAF |
| Model | 80 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1272 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2060 mm |
