1978 Audi 80 vs. 1962 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 1978 Audi 80 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 984 kg more than 1978 Audi 80.
Because 1962 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 80 | 1962 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | 80 | MK X |
Year Released | 1978 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 1896 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2770 mm |