1978 Audi 80 vs. 1964 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1978 Audi 80 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Audi 80 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 80 | 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Audi | Reliant |
Model | 80 | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1978 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2290 mm |