1978 Audi 80 vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1978 Audi 80 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Mazda RX-2 weights approximately 48 kg more than 1978 Audi 80.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Audi 80 | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 80 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2480 mm |