1978 Audi 80 vs. 1996 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1996 Ford Aerostar is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 603 kg more than 1978 Audi 80.
Because 1996 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Audi 80 | 1996 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 80 | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1272 cc | 2979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 133 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3030 mm |
