1978 Audi 80 vs. 2002 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Audi 80 would be higher. At 5,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1766 kg more than 1978 Audi 80.
Because 2002 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1978 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1978 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Audi 80 | 2002 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 80 | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1272 cc | 5966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 340 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 2678 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3310 mm |
