1978 Austin Allegro vs. 1950 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 1978 Austin Allegro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati A6GCS (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1978 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati A6GCS should accelerate faster than 1978 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Austin Allegro weights approximately 191 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6GCS.
Because 1950 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Austin Allegro | 1950 Maserati A6GCS | |
| Make | Austin | Maserati |
| Model | Allegro | A6GCS |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 624 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2320 mm |
