1978 Austin Allegro vs. 1969 Monteverdi 2000
To start off, 1978 Austin Allegro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Monteverdi 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Monteverdi 2000 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Monteverdi 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Monteverdi 2000 (129 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1978 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Monteverdi 2000 should accelerate faster than 1978 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Monteverdi 2000 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1978 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Monteverdi 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Monteverdi 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Austin Allegro | 1969 Monteverdi 2000 | |
Make | Austin | Monteverdi |
Model | Allegro | 2000 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 129 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2560 mm |