1978 Austin Allegro vs. 1982 Lancia Trevi
To start off, 1982 Lancia Trevi is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Lancia Trevi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Lancia Trevi (100 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1978 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Lancia Trevi should accelerate faster than 1978 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lancia Trevi weights approximately 295 kg more than 1978 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Austin Allegro | 1982 Lancia Trevi | |
| Make | Austin | Lancia |
| Model | Allegro | Trevi |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1585 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2550 mm |
