1978 Austin Allegro vs. 1992 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 1992 Plymouth Colt is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Plymouth Colt (111 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1978 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 1978 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 375 kg more than 1978 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Austin Allegro | 1992 Plymouth Colt | |
| Make | Austin | Plymouth |
| Model | Allegro | Colt |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 111 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2530 mm |
