1978 Austin Allegro vs. 1996 Eagle Vision
To start off, 1996 Eagle Vision is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Eagle Vision (217 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1978 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1978 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Eagle Vision weights approximately 770 kg more than 1978 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1978 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1978 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Austin Allegro | 1996 Eagle Vision | |
Make | Austin | Eagle |
Model | Allegro | Vision |
Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |