1978 Austin Allegro vs. 2001 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2001 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP) has 784 more horse power than 1978 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1978 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lotec C 1000 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1978 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Austin Allegro | 2001 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Austin | Lotec |
| Model | Allegro | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 843 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1150 mm |
