1978 Austin Allegro vs. 2004 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2004 MCC ForTwo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Austin Allegro (59 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2004 MCC ForTwo. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Austin Allegro weights approximately 120 kg more than 2004 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 MCC ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Austin Allegro | 2004 MCC ForTwo | |
| Make | Austin | MCC |
| Model | Allegro | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 49 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 1810 mm |
