1978 Austin Allegro vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (391 HP) has 332 more horse power than 1978 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1978 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 815 kg more than 1978 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1978 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1978 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Austin Allegro | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | Allegro | XJ |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 391 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3040 mm |