1978 Austin Allegro vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-Z (122 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1978 Austin Allegro. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1978 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 363 kg more than 1978 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Austin Allegro | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | Allegro | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 122 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1213 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2436 mm |